NextDecade scraps plans for Galveston Bay LNG terminal

US liquefaction plant developer NextDecade is scrapping plans to build the Galveston Bay LNG terminal after it completed an evaluation of the proposed site in Texas City.

The Houston-based firm said in a statement it determined that the site is not suitable for development of an LNG facility and related infrastructure and utilities.

The US Army Corps of Engineers in Galveston told the firm that a portion of the Galveston Bay LNG site is under federal navigation servitude. The site serves as an active dredged material placement area for the Texas City ship channel federal project.

NextDecade says the Galveston Bay LNG project cannot be constructed without USACE requesting that Congress – via the water resources development act or other legislation – authorize the release of its constitutional right of navigation servitude over this DMPA.

On account of the potential for prolonged uncertainty around the prospect of release of federal navigation servitude by USACE, NextDecade has elected to forfeit the Galveston Bay LNG site and will no longer make lease payments to the site’s landholders, including Texas City, it said.

Additionally, NextDecade has informed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission of its intent to withdraw Galveston Bay LNG from pre-filing proceedings and cease all related activities.

The company has also requested that the US Department of Energy terminate its June 2018 authorization for export of LNG from the project.

NextDecade planned to build three liquefaction trains with a production capacity of up to about 5.5 million tonnes per annum of LNG, each.

No impact on Rio Grande LNG as NextDecade targets FID this year

NextDecade says the circumstances of Galveston Bay LNG have no impact on its Rio Grande LNG project in the Port of Brownsville, where “late-stage development activities” are ongoing.

The project includes five trains for a total capacity of 27 million tonnes per year.

Moreover, the firm continues to work on remaining commercial agreements needed to achieve a final investment decision on the LNG project in 2021, it said.

“While it is unfortunate that the Galveston Bay LNG site is not viable for large-scale infrastructure development, this determination only further enhances the value of – and the need for – NextDecade’s world-class Rio Grande LNG project in the Port of Brownsville,” NextDecade chief Matt Schatzman, said.

He added that NextDecade continues to focus on delivering Rio Grande LNG, the “largest export solution linking Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale natural gas to the rapidly tightening global LNG market.”

- Advertisements -

Most Popular

Shell launches largest bio-LNG plant in Germany

A unit of LNG giant Shell has launched what it says is the largest bio-LNG production plant in Germany. The...

Stena Bulk sells its last LNG carrier

Swedish shipping firm Stena Bulk has sold its last liquefied natural gas (LNG) carrier to an undisclosed Asian buyer. The...

Gulfstream LNG asks US FERC to start pre-filing process

Houston-based Gulfstream LNG is seeking approval from the US FERC to initiate the environmental pre-filing review for its mid-sized...

More News Like This

Spot LNG shipping rates remain steady, European prices jump

Spot charter rates for the global liquefied natural gas (LNG) carrier fleet remained almost flat this week, while European...

US weekly LNG exports down to 21 shipments

US liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports decreased in the week ending April 17 compared to the week before, with...

Spot LNG shipping rates continue to drop, European prices climb

Spot charter rates for the global liquefied natural gas (LNG) carrier fleet continued to decrease this week, while European...

US weekly LNG exports down to 22 shipments

US liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports decreased in the week ending April 10 compared to the week before, according...