EU blocks merger of South Korean LNG shipbuilding giants

The European Commission has blocked the merger of South Korean LNG shipbuilders Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering and Hyundai Heavy Industries Holdings.

HHIH revealed back in 2019 plans to buy DSME and merge it with its unit KSOE. The deal worth about $1.8 billion already received approvals from countries such as China, Singapore, and Kazakhstan.

The European Commission said in a statement it has prohibited the merger between the two shipbuilders as it would have created a “dominant position by the new merged company and reduced competition in the worldwide market for the construction of LNG carriers.”

“The parties did not formally offer remedies to address the Commission’s concerns,” it said.

European customers account for almost 50 percent of LNG carrier orders

Both companies are global leaders in the construction of large LNG carriers, and two of the three largest players in this very concentrated market, the statement said.

Over the past five years, the worldwide market for the construction of large LNG carriers represented up to 40 billion euros ($45.9 billion), with European customers accounting for almost 50 percent of all orders, according to the Commission.

During the investigation, the Commission said it had received feedback from a large number of customers, competitors and other third parties.

“These companies were concerned that the transaction would create a company with a dominant position in the worldwide market for the construction large LNG carriers, reduce competition and increase prices for these vessels,” it said.

60 percent market share

The Commission said that the two shipbuilder’s combined market shares would be of at least 60 percent, which in itself is an indicator of a dominant position in the market.

Executive VP Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy, said LNG contributes to the diversification of Europe’s source of energy and therefore improves energy security.

“The merger between HHIH and DSME would have led to a dominant position in the global market for the construction of large LNG vessels, for which there is significant demand from European carriers,” Vestager said.

“Given that no remedies were submitted, the merger would have led to fewer suppliers and higher prices for large vessels transporting LNG. This is why we prohibited the merger,” she said.

Most Popular

Venture Global files for IPO, plans to boost LNG export capacity to 104 mtpa

According to an SEC filing, Venture Global plans to list its Class A common shares under the symbol "VG"...

Germany’s DET offers short-term regas capacity at two LNG terminals

DET announced on Thursday the marketing of short-term regasification capacities at its FSRU-based LNG terminals in Brunsbüttel and Wilhelmshaven...

Swan Energy, Nebula’s AG&P LNG plan Indian JV

Swan Energy said on Friday it had signed a heads of agreement with AG&P Terminals &Logistics (Singapore). The two firms...

More News Like This

CMA CGM pens LoI for LNG-fueled containerships

LNG Prime recently reported that CMA CGM was planning a new order. Sources said on Tuesday that CMA CGM has...

Greece’s Maran Gas to order more LNG carriers in South Korea

Sources told LNG Prime on Thursday that the deal includes two 174,000-cbm LNG carriers powered by ME-GI engines. Hanwha Ocean...

HD Hyundai Heavy starts work on Excelerate’s FSRU

US FSRU player Excelerate announced the steel-cutting ceremony for the 170,000-cbm FSRU (Hull 3407) on Monday. The ceremony took place...

Hanwha Ocean scores $1.26 billion order for LNG-powered containerships

Hanwha Ocean said on Thursday it will build six containerships with a capacity of 15,000 teu. The order is worth...