US DOE denies Lake Charles LNG’s rehearing request

The US DOE has denied a rehearing request by Energy Transfer’s Lake Charles LNG regarding its proposed LNG export facility in Louisiana.

The department said in a filling dated June 21 it has denied Lake Charles LNG’s rehearing request for the second extension of deadline to commence exports of LNG from the proposed project to non-free trade countries.

Lake Charles LNG’s existing authorizations, including its extended deadline to start non-FTA exports under both orders by December 16, 2025, remain in effect.

In addition, should Lake Charles LNG Export be unable to commence exports by December 16, 2025, “it is welcome to submit a new non-FTA application, which would be evaluated under current policies with the most recent market information,” the DOE said.

Contracts signed for about half of planned volumes

In April this year, the department declined the request to extend the deadline to start exports by December 2028.

The department said that Lake Charles LNG has not shown “good cause” for an “unprecedented” second extension.

After that, Energy Transfer’s co-CEO, Tom Long, said the firm “strongly disagrees” with the DOE decision and Lake Charles LNG filed a request for rehearing on May 22.

Lake Charles LNG said in the request it had made “substantial progress” in the commercial development of the development, as evidenced by fully-executed long-term LNG offtake contracts for 7.9 million tons of LNG per annum, about half of the FERC-approved LNG production capacity of the facility.

The firm also said it is in “active discussions” with customers related to the remaining capacity.

Also, Energy Transfer said that it obtained EPC bids from two contractors in May this year.

Energy Transfer announced six SPAs during last year and the customers include China GasGunvorENNSK Gas, and Shell.

The company’s Lake Charles LNG project seeks to convert the company’s existing regasification terminal to an LNG export facility.

It has a proposed liquefaction capacity of 16.45 mtpa and includes three trains and also modifications to the Trunkline Gas pipeline.

Energy Transfer to continue to develop the project

LNG Prime invited Energy Transfer to comment on DOE’s decision.

“We are disappointed by yesterday’s decision of the Department of Energy related to Lake Charles LNG,” a spokesperson for Energy Transfer said in an emailed statement.

“In light of the significant progress of Lake Charles LNG, we plan to continue to develop the project which may include the use of Lake Charles’ existing DOE export authorization,” the spokesperson said.

(Article updated to add a statement by Energy Transfer.)

Most Popular

Cheniere to start site preparation for two more Corpus Christi LNG trains

US LNG exporting giant Cheniere is seeking approval from the US FERC to start site preparation activities for two more midscale trains at its Corpus Christi LNG plant in Texas.

Woodside names Sarah Bairstow as Louisiana LNG head

Australian LNG player Woodside has appointed Sarah Bairstow to lead its Louisiana LNG project.

LNG shipping rates continue to decrease

Spot LNG freight shipping rates in both basins continued to decrease this week, while European prices increased compared to last week.

More News Like This

Energy Transfer seeks FERC extension for Lake Charles LNG export terminal

Texas-based Energy Transfer is seeking an extension of time from the US FERC to complete and place into service its planned Lake Charles LNG export facility in Louisiana.

Energy Transfer, EIG’s MidOcean to jointly develop Lake Charles LNG project

MidOcean Energy, the LNG unit of US-based energy investor EIG, has signed a heads of agreement with Energy Transfer to jointly develop the latter's Lake Charles LNG export facility in Louisiana.

Power LNG expects to complete FEED this year

Texas-based Power LNG expects to complete front-end engineering and design (FEED) for its proposed Newport Galveston LNG facility in 2025.

DOE gives further boost to US LNG exports

The US Department of Energy (DOE) has removed a regulatory barrier that required liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects to start export within seven years of receiving regulatory approval.