NextDecade scraps plans for Galveston Bay LNG terminal

US liquefaction plant developer NextDecade is scrapping plans to build the Galveston Bay LNG terminal after it completed an evaluation of the proposed site in Texas City.

The Houston-based firm said in a statement it determined that the site is not suitable for development of an LNG facility and related infrastructure and utilities.

The US Army Corps of Engineers in Galveston told the firm that a portion of the Galveston Bay LNG site is under federal navigation servitude. The site serves as an active dredged material placement area for the Texas City ship channel federal project.

NextDecade says the Galveston Bay LNG project cannot be constructed without USACE requesting that Congress – via the water resources development act or other legislation – authorize the release of its constitutional right of navigation servitude over this DMPA.

On account of the potential for prolonged uncertainty around the prospect of release of federal navigation servitude by USACE, NextDecade has elected to forfeit the Galveston Bay LNG site and will no longer make lease payments to the site’s landholders, including Texas City, it said.

Additionally, NextDecade has informed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission of its intent to withdraw Galveston Bay LNG from pre-filing proceedings and cease all related activities.

The company has also requested that the US Department of Energy terminate its June 2018 authorization for export of LNG from the project.

NextDecade planned to build three liquefaction trains with a production capacity of up to about 5.5 million tonnes per annum of LNG, each.

No impact on Rio Grande LNG as NextDecade targets FID this year

NextDecade says the circumstances of Galveston Bay LNG have no impact on its Rio Grande LNG project in the Port of Brownsville, where “late-stage development activities” are ongoing.

The project includes five trains for a total capacity of 27 million tonnes per year.

Moreover, the firm continues to work on remaining commercial agreements needed to achieve a final investment decision on the LNG project in 2021, it said.

“While it is unfortunate that the Galveston Bay LNG site is not viable for large-scale infrastructure development, this determination only further enhances the value of – and the need for – NextDecade’s world-class Rio Grande LNG project in the Port of Brownsville,” NextDecade chief Matt Schatzman, said.

He added that NextDecade continues to focus on delivering Rio Grande LNG, the “largest export solution linking Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale natural gas to the rapidly tightening global LNG market.”

Most Popular

BP, partners take FID on $7 billion Tangguh UCC project

BP said in a statement on Thursday the Tangguh Ubadari, CCUS, compression project (UCC) has the potential to unlock...

CoolCo seeks long-term employment for two LNG carriers

In August, Coolco said it plans to employ its first newbuild LNG vessel, Kool Tiger, on a shorter deal...

LNG Canada pipeline enters commercial service

Canada's TC Energy said on Tuesday CGL had executed a commercial agreement with LNG Canada and CGL customers that...

More News Like This

Atlantic LNG shipping rates dip to record low

Last week, Atlantic LNG shipping rates rose for the second week in a row. “Spark30S Atlantic rates have fallen $10,500...

US LNG exports decrease to 23 cargoes

The agency said in its weekly report, citing shipping data provided by Bloomberg Finance, that the total capacity of...

GECF: global LNG imports up 8.6 percent in October

In October, global LNG imports increased by 2.73 Mt y-o-y to 34.40 Mt, Doha-based GECF said in its monthly...

Atlantic LNG shipping rates rise to $26,000 per day

Last week, Atlantic LNG shipping rates rose for the first time in seven weeks. “Spark30S Atlantic rates have experienced the largest...